Best
Home business in 2007
3 Things Marketing Experts Don't Tell You About Split
Testing
By: Jim Stone
I've been split testing for a while now, and even use some pretty
advanced methods these days. It has worked out well for me, but I still
remember many early disappointments.
Many very smart marketers will tell you there's a lot of power in A/B
split testing.
They'll even tell you that you CAN get 1000% improvements by changing a
single word -- or even a single letter.
These marketers are right. But if you think they're telling you the
whole story, you're in for a rude awakening! I found out there were a
few things the experts hadn't told me.
Here are three of the most important things:
1. It's More Difficult To Set Up And Run A Simple Split Test Than You
Might Think:
In order to set up a good split test you must:
* upload a new sales page with just one change to it. You might also
have to create two different "thankyou" pages, depending on how you set
up your tracking.
* get a script that splits traffic between the two pages. Ideally this
traffic splitter will split the traffic randomly, and not just in an
"every other" fashion.
* make sure your script sets a cookie on the visitor's machine and
serves the same page to them the next time they come to the site.
* put a tracking system in place that will track your visitors and your
sales for both pages separately.
* set up a database (perhaps).
And getting set up is just part of the hassle. It's also difficult to
run the test and interpret your results.
One time I set up a test, and started sending traffic to the pages
being split tested. Then I noticed a typo on ad B. So I corrected it.
Now, "strictly speaking" I shouldn't have changed anything during the
test, but I was probably OK doing this, even though it's not
technically good form.
That wasn't the problem. Here's the bad part: when I made the change to
my page, my editing software (without my knowing it) changed the names
of the fields in my opt-in form on page B, and, as a result, it didn't
work any more.
I didn't realize the mistake until a week later. During the week I had
marveled at how ad A had done so well, while ad B pretty much just
stood still.
That was one week wasted. My results were meaningless.
(I don't know about you, but this kind of thing happens to me all the
time. These are the stupid pesky gremlins that infest every new thing I
try. Why can't things ever go as planned?)
Other things can happen, too. Ad campaigns can stop. Hurricanes can
strike. Terrorists can strike. Christmas can strike. Your page can get
listed on the front page of Yahoo, and suddenly you're getting a
different kind of traffic -- and lots of it. All of these things can
create "noise" that affects how your ads perform.
You also have to know how long to run your test before your results are
"statistically significant".
Truly, simple split testing can be something of a hassle.
But the hassle isn't really the worst part about split testing. Here's
something else the split testing "gurus" haven't told you:
2. You Can't Consistently Get Great Results On Your Own.
If you look at your landing page, and ask yourself, "How can I improve
this?" You will probably come up with something to test. And then you
will test it.
Good for you, right? You were Johnny on the spot. You got going right
away. You didn't sit around debating the merits of your choice. You
took action. What could be wrong with that?
The problem is you probably came up with some safe little change. Some
timid little tweak. And it probably didn't help much, if any at all
(and it might have hurt). It probably wasn't a golden nugget that
significantly boosted your response. It might have been, but it
probably wasn't.
The truth is, to get best results, you need to get others to help you
brainstorm for testing ideas.
But the experts haven't told you that.
And there's one more thing they haven't told you:
3. With Simple Split Tests, You Should Be Prepared For Lengthy Strings
Of Disappointing Tests -- Even When You Generate Great Ideas.
Did you know that most of the changes you make to your landing page
will not help?
According to Charles Holland of Qualpro (Breakthrough Business Results
With MVT), if you run 25 split tests, about 13 won't show any
significant difference. And 6 of the proposed changes will have a
negative effect. That leaves about 6 to have a significant positive
effect. That's 6 improvements out of 25 tests.
But it gets worse. Did you know it takes about 100 ideas to get 25
elements that you can easily split test? That's because 75% of the
ideas you will generate for improving your ad will be things that are
too expensive or time consuming to implement, or can't be combined with
other things you want to include on your page.
That means you must generate 100 testing ideas to get 6 that will
actually make a positive difference on your page.
Please, re-read that sentence, and let it sink in this time. It's that
important.
If you have ever been discouraged by a string of 5 or 6 A/B split tests
that made no difference, all in a row, you know in your heart that
these numbers are very close to the mark. You might have felt alone --
just an unlucky sap for whom nothing ever goes right -- but you were
actually just experiencing normal, run-of-the-mill split testing.
The experts didn't tell you that, either.
They didn't tell you how much of a hassle it can be, they didn't tell
you what you need to do to generate good ideas, and they didn't tell
you how long it can take to get meaningful results.
So How Do You Deal With These Problems?
1. The hassle. You're just going to have to bite the bullet. Split
testing is one of the best ways to improve your profits. Get some good
software, and some good information about running and interpreting your
tests, and just dig in. This doesn't exactly made it any easier, but at
least you've been warned.
2. The help. Imagine what kind of ideas you would get if you assembled
20 people in a room. Other marketers, potential customers, existing
customers, maybe your mother. And you ask them the question "How can I
improve this sales page?" And you let them throw ideas out, and let
other people's ideas inspire new ideas, and you do this until you have
100 ideas -- ideas that come from many perspectives, from people with
nothing to lose, and from people who are thinking more and more "out of
the box" as the session goes on.
If you could do THIS, then you would have a good chance of finding some
truly good testing ideas.
Such a big brainstorming session is impractical for most people. That's
true. But it can't hurt to be told what the ideal is. At least now
you'll be thinking of ways you can approach this ideal.
For instance, you might consider checking out what your competitors are
doing. You might pay better attention to the marketing books you've
read. You might solicit ideas from discussion forums.
And maybe, just maybe, you will go to the trouble of actually getting a
few friends and relatives to sit around with you and brainstorm a bit.
3. The discouragement. First, it helps just to be told what to expect.
Winning ideas are rare, but they usually deliver big results when they
come. So the hunt is worthwhile, but it can be discouraging.
But there's actually something you can do to change the situation in
your favor.
There's a new method of split testing called "accelerated split
testing", or "Taguchi testing", or "Multi-variate testing". It allows
you to take all your ideas -- the good ones and the bad ones -- and
test them all at once. Your chances of hitting a winner (or two or
three) somewhere in that jumble is actually very, very good. If you set
your tests up right, you should get significant improvements from
almost every single test.
So there you go. Three problems the experts haven't told you about, and
three ways to deal with the problems.
Now you've been told.
About the author:
Jim Stone is an accelerated split testing expert. He has developed an
accelerated split testing software product, and writes regularly on the
subject. You may receive his free course: "10 Steps To More Sales With
Accelerated Split Testing" at: http://www.splittestaccelerator.com
Circulated by Article Emporium
Return to Index